Buy on Amazon
€515
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 26% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2620 - 745 vs 591 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel BX8070110900K Core i9-10900K (fase base: 3,70GHz; attacco: LGA1200; 125 Watt) Box
Buy for €515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68755 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
400
22.870211549456833%
Multi-Core
1945
21.22667248717669%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.