Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2604 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 15% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2620 - 134 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€265.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €265.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |