Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 2169 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-2620 - 305 vs 296 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
305
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€112.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €112.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |