Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 631 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 85 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 183 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |