Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1705 days newer than Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 61% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-650 - 37 vs 23 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 73 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €148.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
449
48.488120950323975%
Multi-Core
916
22.922922922922922%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-650 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |