Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 829 days newer than Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3470S - 177 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
171
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470S |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |