Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4790 is 130 days older than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 342 vs 323 FPS
- Consumes up to 1% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 84 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-4790
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-4790 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
