Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2609 v3 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2609 v3 is 644 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G1610 - 109 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 55 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
106
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10659 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
85 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |