Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 2143 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 271 vs 238 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
271
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |