Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms Xeon E5-2440 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2440 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 190 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2440 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-13600
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2440 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
285
11.694706606483381%
Multi-Core
1889
15.209339774557165%
Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
