Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1872 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 6% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5-2420 - 235 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 64 vs 12 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | EPYC |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |