Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 2431 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 150 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 48 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Xeon w7-2495X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1228
52.01185938161795%
Multi-Core
7000
37.39515999786313%
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Broadwell | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 48 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
