Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1730 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 145 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€327.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €327.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |