Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1680 v4 outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1680 v4 is 2213 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-875K - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
