Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7940HS is 2411 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Performs up to 59% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 170 vs 107 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 9 7940HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1228
49.716599190283404%
Multi-Core
7000
60.209874419404784%
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
