Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7645HX is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
- Performs up to 40% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 102 vs 73 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 5 7645HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1228
45.85511575802838%
Multi-Core
7000
59.41770647653001%
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
