Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 2424 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 58 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |