Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1680 v2 outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1680 v2 is 314 days older than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Pentium G3250 - 157 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
