Buy on Amazon
€128.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1723
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1723
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $312
Availability
MSRP in USD: $312
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770 outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4770 is 100 days older than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Performs up to 27% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 334 vs 262 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 84 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-4770
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
334
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-4770
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i7-4770
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1680 v2 or Core i7-4770
Counter-Strike 2, 1920 x 1080, Very High
105 FPS
€7.61/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Core i7-4770
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€799
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
