Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 2744 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 483 vs 458 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i3-10105T
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
651
51.25984251968504%
Multi-Core
3994
100%
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
