Buy on Amazon
€25.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1113
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1113
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 1387 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 14% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Pentium G645T - 137 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
120
87.59124087591242%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Processore Intel Pentium G645T Usato for Desktop 2-Core 2-Thread 2,5 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1840 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1660 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
30.264279624893437%
Multi-Core
606
9.009812667261375%
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Broadwell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
