Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms Xeon E5-1660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 2506 days newer than Xeon E5-1660 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-1660 v2 - 180 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
