Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-1650.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-1650 - 247 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
247
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€515
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61015 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
593
33.905088622069755%
Multi-Core
2936
32.04190767215977%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |