Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 197 days older than Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7400T - 169 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
