Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 416 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 24 vs 12 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
99.49152542372882%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
