Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7845HX is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 240 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
44.561933534743204%
Multi-Core
5480
39.793769515648826%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
