Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1650 v3 - 128 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |