Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1112 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 542 vs 526 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
542
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€241.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €241.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |