Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 278 vs 269 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
278
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€254.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €254.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |