Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |