Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G5400 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G5400 is 2218 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-1620 - 244 vs 240 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 58 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |