Buy on Amazon
€1,138.2
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 2783 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 11% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5-1620 - 253 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 28 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-10940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1138.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Processore Intel Core serie X i9-10940X a 14 core con 3.3 GHz (fino a 4,8 GHz con Turbo Boost 3.0, processore LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (999PND)
Buy for €1,138.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-10940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 28 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
