Buy on Amazon
€60.38
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1274 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1620 - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core i3-6100 Processor (3M Cache, 3.70 GHz)
Buy for €60.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
600
50.25125628140703%
Multi-Core
2238
95.80479452054794%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.