Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7940HS is 3978 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Performs up to 27% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Xeon E5-1620 - 161 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 9 7940HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
600
24.291497975708502%
Multi-Core
2238
19.249956992946842%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
