Buy on Amazon
€579.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3045 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-1620 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen™ 9 3900XT - Processore (12C/24T, 70 MB di cache, fino a 4,7 GHz di boost massimo), senza dissipatore
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
