Buy on Amazon
€122.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2235 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-1620 - 165 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Wraith Prism LED RGB Ventola di raffreddamento del processore Ryzen 7 2700X AM4/AM2/AM3/AM3+Connettore a 4 pin Base in rame/Dissipatore di calore in alluminio, Computer desktop
Buy for €122.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
