Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 2772 days newer than Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-940 - 168 vs 162 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 130 vs 140 Watts
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-940
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-940
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
447
41.08455882352941%
Multi-Core
1532
39.30220625962032%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
