Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 2213 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-875K - 190 vs 189 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
509
46.783088235294116%
Multi-Core
1761
45.17701385325808%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
