Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1513 days newer than Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770S - 180 vs 172 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
61.48897058823529%
Multi-Core
2234
57.3114417650077%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
