Buy on Amazon
€402.59
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP $294
Availability
MSRP $294
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1410 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 44% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 121 vs 84 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€402.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-10700F processor 2.9 GHz 16 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €402.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
PCs Using Xeon E5-1620 v4 or Core i7-10700F
With selected game settings
1 FPS
€729/FPS
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€729
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
