Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670 is 1114 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 529 vs 519 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 84 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
529
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €26.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |