Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i5-10210U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1157 days older than Core i5-10210U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10210U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-10210U |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 21st, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 15 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |