Buy on Amazon
€819.9
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1485 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 140 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 16% better in Dead Island 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 164 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€819.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD PROCESADOR CPU RYZEN THREADRIPPER PRO 3955WX 4.3GHZ SWRX8 72MB 280W
Buy for €819.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
64.9164677804296%
Multi-Core
3898
31.55508783291508%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
