Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 374 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 - 143 vs 142 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
