Buy on Amazon
€108.2
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $154
Availability
MSRP in USD: $154
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600G is 1492 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
- Performs up to 44% better in League of Legends than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 184 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G processor 3.7 GHz 8 MB L3 Box
Buy for €108.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 5 4600G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
69.12325285895807%
Multi-Core
3898
63.620042435123224%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1620 v4 or Ryzen 5 4600G
League of Legends, 1920 x 1080, Very High
164 FPS
€4.87/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Ryzen 5 4600G
8 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€799
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
