Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 295 days older than Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Ryzen 5 1400 - 222 vs 220 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 5 1400
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 1400
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
949
87.22426470588235%
Multi-Core
3098
79.47665469471524%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
