Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Xeon E5-2667 v3 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 156 vs 154 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 135 vs 140 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 135 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |