Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2675 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 7% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 191 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €164.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |