Buy on Amazon
€102.38
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 100 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 150 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 84 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core I5-4670K 3,4GHz LGA1150 6MB Cache Haswell Boxed CPU No Cooler
Buy for €102.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66731 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
644
51.31474103585657%
Multi-Core
2356
66.47855530474041%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.