Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 372 days newer than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i5-3330 - 257 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 77 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
255
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10467 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |